Search for: "Million v. DHS"
Results 1 - 20
of 225
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
Mathews v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 10:05 am
”For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/eff-v-dhs-vlvi For more on social media monitoring:https://www.eff.org/issues/social-media-surveilance Contact: MukundRathiStanton Legal Fellowmukund@eff.org [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:39 pm
Department of Homeland Security (No. 11-604) and Judicial Watch v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 7:10 am
In 2015, an intrusion into a federal agency resulted in the compromise of over 4 million federal employees’ personnel records, affecting nearly 22 million people. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 8:45 am
In Washington Alliance of Technical Workers v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:24 am
DHS reports that so far over 87,000 employers have run over 6.5 million queries! [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
DHS provided detailed abstracts of the particular sections of the statutes that established and authorized the US-VISIT program in prior rulemakings and the proposed rule. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
This case involves approximately $7 million in welfare benefits paid by the state each month that may not otherwise have been paid if DHS is allowed to implement the contested eligibility requirements. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 11:39 pm
Pursuant to such contracts, CSS received many millions of dollars annually from the City. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am
Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 4:50 pm
DHS (E.D. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 9:37 pm
DHS, may be the most significant administrative law rulings of the Term.] [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
Citizenship and Immigration Services; DHS. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
”), and DOL Administrator v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
”), and DOL Administrator v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:10 pm
In the AFL-CIO v Chertoff litigation concerning the DHS rulemaking, the District Court in the Northern District of California had issued a preliminary injunction to stay the effect of the DHS no-match safe-harbor final rule. [read post]
